Workshop
posted by Gavin | 8:50 PM
There were some ideas I thought of with during the discussion, and there is someone from the USGS we may work with in the future to help describe the performance and limitations of the entry system on a global scale. Which will be very useful for helping the scientists chose landing sites. So that was pretty cool.
I must have been getting tired near the end of the day, though. A prominent Mars scientist, who is a principal investigator for several Mars missions, was rather emphatic that the scientists needed more data from the 'lazy' engineers on the shape of the landing ellipse and that this laziness shouldn't be tolerated. Perhaps he was joking, but I didn't hear that in his tone. Instead, I heard an insult directed at my team, and in particular, at me. So I promptly stood up and answered him, explaining why the ellipse was the way it was and that it probably wouldn't be changing any time soon. As I finished, my project manager spoke up and managed, with a single comment, to turn the matter lightly, evoking some chuckles, and calm the situation. Which I appreciated. We spoke with the scientist afterward, he apologized for his choice of words and he had some good suggestions on how the engineers could help future landing site discussions.
Anyways. I don't think it was my most diplomatic moment out here. I'm still fuming a little bit about it. And wondering if I could have handled it better. I always wonder how to handle things better.
Sarah's flying out tonight, we have another technical review tomorrow so I'll have to miss a day of the workshop. Hopefully on Friday I can catch the end of it. I wonder how many baseballs games I'm going to see with Sarah over the next few days...
Labels: rocket science










